【纽曼】第3章两张图的解释

Chapter 3: Technical Description of Drawings
Note: The drawings referred to are the last two in Chapter 2, and this chapter provides a separate explanation for each.
"... it is Impossible for anyone to begin to learn what he thinks he already knows."
Starting to learn how to view known knowledge is important for anyone.
- Epictetus
The above section describes the technical drawings for one aspect of Joseph Newman's theories. The two drawings - Magnetic Fields in Repulsion and Magnetic Fields in Attraction - depict three bar magnets in a three-dimensional configuration, surrounded and penetrated by circulating gyroscopic particles. Each particle spins while traveling along "lines (shells) of force (direction)" that alternate in opposite directions consecutively. [The difference between the two drawings is that the central magnet is reversed.]
According to Mr. Newman, these gyroscopic particles are the smallest particles known and make up all atoms in the universe. The technical drawings are qualitative in nature; quantitatively, there are trillions of such gyroscopic particles flowing in the described paths to generate the magnetic field. Although sub-atomic particles will be shielded by lead, the effects of magnetic fields can be observed through lead shielding. According to Mr. Newman, this is one proof that these particles are the most fundamental particles known.
These drawings represent the first time in the history of physics that there is presented in an explicit pictorial fashion (via the concepts innovated by Mr. Newman) a precise, mechanical explanation of the phenomena of magnetism and the principle of "action at a distance."
In his researches on magnetism, James Clerk Maxwell (as well as Michael Faraday) explicitly described the lines of force surrounding a magnet as kinetic, mechanical energy. (Maxwell called electromagnetism "matter in motion.") This description by Maxwell has been forgotten in the past 100 years. While Maxwell could not explain in detail the action of a magnet, he did recognize that such action is mechanical in nature.
As one passes a conductor wire in front of and across the end of a bar magnet, one will observe the current to flow first in one direction, then become neutral, then reverse itself and flow in the opposite direction. This occurs due to the nature of the flow of the gyroscopic particles as they flow from each end of the bar magnet (see drawings above). On one side of the south (S) end of the bar magnet, for instance, the particles flowing in and out along the "lines of force" spin "up," while on the other side of the same south end, the particles flowing in and out along the "lines of force" spin "down." A spinning gyroscope will move at right angles to the force acting upon it; hence, as the gyroscopic particles encounter the particles composing the conductor wire, they move "up" or "down" the conductor (at right angles to the direction that they first encounter the conductor).
Mr. Newman indicates that it is principally the spin of the gyroscopic particle (and not the direction of flow for the gyroscopic particles along the "lines of force") that determines magnetic repulsion and attraction. The interaction of the peripheries of the particles actually effects such repulsion and attraction (see PROOF A). Although the drawings depict space between the particles flowing in a given "line of force," in actuality the particles are more like individual spirals upon a strand of beads in the shape of a helix which results in a gyroscopic action - each particle "bumping against the next." [According to Mr. Newman, between each particle there is a very small amount of space created by the electromagnetic force surrounding each particle.]
As the drawings depict, the actual "lines of force" are really shells of force which envelop the magnet as discrete shells of gyroscopic particles which lie concentrically within other shells. These "lines of force" (as depicted in one plane on the drawings) or shells of force (in actuality) travel (rotate) in opposite directions relative to one another. The effect of such motion is to place the peripheries of respective gyroscopic particles (from one "line of force" to the next) at opposition (or repulsion) to one another and consequently keep each "line of force" separated from each adjoining (concentric) "line (shell) of force."
Note: NS-poles emitted force lines are repulsive.
In addition, there are as many "force lines" emanating from each end of the bar magnet as there are atoms aligned magnetically across the width and height of the N and S ends of the magnet. Because of the large size of iron filings relative to the sub-atomic size of the gyroscopic particles, the particles within the "force line" congeal into clumps of the filings via the naked eye into a relatively few number of such lines. Which means, with more finely-ground iron filings, more "force lines" would become visible to the human eye.
Each particle (M) travels along the "force line" at the speed of light (C) and also individually spins at the speed of light (C). Consequently, such motion results in energy (E) since E = MC2.
It should also be noted that, based on the theories of Mr. Newman, I constructed three-dimensional models of two bar magnets to study how the gyroscopic particles interact. Using simple Styrofoam (for the bar magnet), wire (for the "force lines"), and wooden beads (for the gyroscopic particles), I was able to construct these models as shown in the technical drawings. (This is only an analogous construction. Mr. Newman does not state there is a solid particle spinning on its axis as it moves, but probably is a particle moving [in effect, spinning] in a circular [spiraling helix] configuration at the speed of light and moving forward at the speed of light (within the general helix action); such combined motion equals c2.) (See Figure 13-G.)
An interesting observation occurred following construction and study of these two models: while the N and S pole faces of two magnets attract when placed directly end-to-end, if one shifts the same faces to the side of one another (keeping them in the same plane), one will notice that the periphery spin of the gyroscopic particles flowing from N and S will interact to repel one another, even though opposite poles normally attract each other in a head-on position.
This simple experiment to test the validity of an explanation for a previously unobserved (or if observed, then unexplained) magnetic phenomenon is a powerful corroboration for the rightness of Mr. Newman's theories.
Similarly, with two like poles (N to N or S to S) brought together - while they repel each other when placed head-on, the models appeared to indicate that the magnets would attract each other when the ends are placed slightly side by side (alongside one another and overlapping in the same plane). For this writer, the real test was whether actual magnets behaved in this manner. In testing such magnets, I found that such side attraction (with N to N) and side repulsion (with N to S) were observed exactly as the mechanical descriptions of Mr. Newman would predict and indicate. This simple experiment to test the validity of an explanation for a previously unobserved (or if observed, then unexplained) magnetic phenomena is a powerful corroboration for the rightness of Mr. Newman's theories.
Technically speaking, like a water wheel harnessing the mechanical action of a river, Mr. Newman has effectively designed a machine capable of harnessing the above-described magnetic energy and converting it to useful electrical energy. Therefore, the produced electrical energy comes from the gyroscopic particles comprising the atoms of the magnet. A magnetic field is created (as the drawings indicate) when the atoms of a given material become aligned. According to Mr. Newman, the motion of the gyroscopic particles about the "force lines" surrounding a magnet are a precise reflection of the interior, structural interaction of these particles within a given atom. The larger particles (quark, neutrino, meson, electron, proton, neutron, etc.) are various configurations and agglutinations of the gyroscopic particle. As the atoms become aligned within a magnet-to-be, they begin to act upon (and magnify) one another's individual, atomic, magnetic fields to integrate with one another until such fields completely mesh and expand to become the magnetic field of the complete magnet.
One may wonder that, if the magnets are depleted of their gyroscopic particles during the course of the operation of Mr. Newman's machine, will they not eventually lose their mass completely? The answer is yes, although because Mr. Newman's energy machine operates at 100% conversion efficiency (there being no radiation, heat, light, etc., as in nuclear fission reactions which operate at less than 1% efficiency), and because there are trillions plus gyroscopic particles within each atom, Mr. Newman estimates that it would literally be thousands of years before one would detect any significant, measurable amount of mass loss within a magnet.
It should be noted that Mr. Newman has worked on these ideas for 19 years. Mr. Newman submitted his theoretical discussion and proofs to the patent office several years before he constructed the actual working prototype of his energy machine. Mr. Newman was totally convinced of the

本文如未解决您的问题请添加抖音号：51dongshi（抖音搜索懂视），直接咨询即可。